System for Assessing the Effectiveness of Temporary Blinding Devices

The development of non-lethal weapons and, in particular, temporary blinding devices is associated with problem of choosing boundaries of effectiveness. The aim of present work is determination of criteria for estimation of the effects of visual jamming devices action on the naked eye.

The present-day scoring system used for effectiveness estimation of laser temporary blinding devices is based on maximum permissible exposure and/or accessible emission level defined for each hazard class in accordance with operating standard.

In the present work we carried out analysis and modeling of the cases of application of temporary blinding laser devices. The proposed scoring system was founded on international standard IEC 60825-1-2014 as well as Manual on Laser Emitters and Flight Safety. The modeling of bright light action on observer eye was rested on CIE General Disability Glare Equation and provided quantitative description of jamming effectiveness. The main parameters used in this model and dictated by ambient light level and human eye characteristics, were veiling luminance and angle of distinguishing objects under it.

In terms of exposition level and perception effects we determined six zones – unallowed, hazard, temporary blinding, discomfort, alerting, completely safe. Proposed system combined with modeling provides with visual demonstration of perceived light source and allows to describe human physiological sensation and to establish the fact of jamming at different distances. This system was the basis of the development of temporary blinding device for revelation of safe but effective spatial boundaries of action.

1. Hoffberger E. Non-lethal weapons: The Principle of proportionality in armed conflict and the right to health in law enforcement. Zb Pravnog Fak Sveučilišta U Rijeci, 2017, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 831–853. DOI: 10.30925/zpfsr.38.2.6

2. Peters A. Blinding Laser Weapons: New Limits on the Technology of Warfare. Loy LA Int’l & Comp LJ, 1996, vol. 18, pp. 733–766.

3. Giridhar P., Dandona R., Prasad M.N., Kovai V., Dandona L. Fear of Blindness and Perceptions about Blind People. The Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. INDIAN J Ophthalmol, 2002, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 8.

4. Bullough J.D., Sweater-Hickcox K., Narendran N. A method for estimating discomfort glare from exterior lighting system. Alliance Solid-State Illum Syst Technol, 2011, vol. 9, pp. 1–7.

5. Clear R. Discomfort glare: What do we actually know? Light Res Technol, 2013, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 141– 158. DOI: 10.1177/1477153512444527

6. Tyukhova Y.I. Discomfort glare from small, high luminance light sources in outdoor nighttime environments. Architectural Engineering − Dissertations and Student Research. Lincoln, 2015, 295 p.

7. Denniston A., Murray P. Oxford Handbook of Ophthalmology. OUP Oxford, 2014, 1108 p.

8. IKAO [ICAO]. Available at: https://www.favt.ru/dejatelnost-mezhdunarodnaja-dejatelnostikao/?id=796 (accessed 17 September 2019).

9. Vos J.J. On the cause of disability glare and its dependence on glare angle, age and ocular pigmentation. Clin Exp. Optom., 2003, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 363–370. DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2003.tb03080.x

10. Williamson C.A. Simple computer visualization of laser eye dazzle. J Laser Appl., 2016, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 012003. DOI: 10.2351/1.4932620

11. Williamson C.A., McLin L.N. Nominal ocular dazzle distance (NODD). Appl. Opt., 2015, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 1564. DOI: 10.1364/AO.54.001564

12. Vandewal M., Eeckhout M., Budin D. Estimation of Laser Dazzle Effects on Shooting Performance. Hum Factors Mech. Eng. Def. Saf., 2019, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 12. DOI: 10.1007/s41314-019-0028-2