THE METHOD OF GEOMETRIC CALIBRATION OF OPTOELECTRONIC SYSTEMS BASED ON ELECTRONIC TEST OBJECT
https://doi.org/10.21122/2220-9506-2017-8-4-46-54
Abstract
Designing remote sensing of the Earth devices is requires a lot of attention to evaluation lens distortion level and providing the required accuracy values of geometric calibration of optoelectronic systems at all. Test- objects known as most common tools for optical systems geometric calibration. The purpose of the research was creating an automatically method of distortion correction coefficients calculating with a 3 μm precision in the measurement process. The method of geometric calibration of the internal orientation elements of the optical system based on the electronic test object is proposed. The calculation of the test string brightness image from its multispectral image and filtered signal extrema position determination are presented. Ratio of magnitude of the distortion and interval center is given. Three variants of electronic test-objects with different step and element size are considered. Оptimal size of calibration element was defined as 3×3 pixels due to shape of the subpixels with the aspect ratio of the radiating areas about 1 : 3. It is advisable to use IPS as an electronic test object template. An experimental test and measurement stand functional diagram based on the collimator and optical bench «OSK-2CL» is showed. It was determined that test objects with a grid spacing of 4 and 8 pixels can’t provide tolerable image because of non-collimated emission of active sites and scattering on optical surfaces – the shape of the elements is substantially disrupted. Test-object with a 12 pixels grid spacing was used to distortion level analyzing as most suitable.
Ratio of coordinate increment and element number graphs for two photographic lenses (Canon EF-S 17-85 f/4-5.6 IS USM and EF-S 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 IS II) are presented. A calculation of the distortion values in edge zones was held, which were respectively 43 μm and 51.6 μm. The technique and algorithm of software implementation is described. Possible directions of the method development are mentioned.
About the Authors
D. A. KozhevnikovBelarus
Nezavisimosty Ave., 65, Minsk 220013
R. V. Feodortsau
Belarus
Address for correspondence: Fiodortсev R.V.– Belarusian National Technical University, Nezavisimosty Ave., 65, Minsk 220013, Belarus e-mail: feod@tut.by
References
1. Cramer M. EUROSDR network on digital camera calibration. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2004, vol. 35, part B6, рр. 204–209.
2. Schuster R., Braunecker B. Calibration of the ADS40 airborne digital sensor. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2000, vol. 33, part B1, рр. 288–294.
3. Alharthy A., Bethel J. Laboratory self-calibration of a multi-band sensor. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2001, vol. 34, part 3A, рр. 23–28.
4. Yezhova K.V. [Mathematical Modeling of Photogrammetric Distortion]. Nauchno-tekhnicheskij vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta informacionnykh tekhnologij, mekhaniki i optiki [Scientifi and Technical Herald of the St. Petersburg State University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics], 2006, vol. 26, рр. 235–239 (in Russian).
5. Komissarov D.V., Komissarov A.V. Metodika kalibrovki cifrovyh nemetricheskikh kamer dlya nazemnykh lazernykh skanerov [Method for calibrating digital nonmetric cameras for ground-based laser scanners] Available at: http://www.geoprofi.ru/default.and B”, 1997, 295 p. (in Russian).
6. Kochkurov S.A. Izmerenie i korrektsiya iskazhenii izobrazheniya, vyzvannykh distorsiei ob’ektiva skanera [Measurement and correction of images caused by the distortion of the scanner lens]. Available at: http:// skochkurov.narod.ru/DistortionPaper.html (in Russian).
7. Brown Duane С. The Bundle Adjustment – Progress and Prospects. XIII. Congress of the International Society for Photogrammetry. Helsinki, 21 (3), 1976, Melbourne (Florida – USA), DBA Systems, 1976, 33 s., 12 obr. Signature: K39684.
8. Kurkov V.M. [Methods of accounting for systematic aerial imaging]. Self-calibration «Izvestia VUZ» Geodesy and aerial photography", 1980, № 6, pp. 75–79 (in Russian).
9. Digital SLR cameras EOS and compact system cameras Canon EOS 60D. – 2017. Available at: https://www.canon.com/for_home/product_finder/cameras/ digital_slr/eos_60d/
10. Lens EF-S Lenses Canon EF-S 17–85 mm f / 4–5.6 IS USM. – 2017. Available at: https://www.canon. com/lenses/ef-s-17-85mm-f-4-5-6-is-usm-lens/.
11. Lens EF-S Lenses Canon EF-S 18–55 mm f / 3.5–5.6 IS II. – 2017. Available at: https://www.canon. com/lenses/ef-s-18-55mm-f-3-5-5-6-is-ii-lens/.
Review
For citations:
Kozhevnikov D.A., Feodortsau R.V. THE METHOD OF GEOMETRIC CALIBRATION OF OPTOELECTRONIC SYSTEMS BASED ON ELECTRONIC TEST OBJECT. Devices and Methods of Measurements. 2017;8(4):374-385. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21122/2220-9506-2017-8-4-46-54