Experimental Setup for Detecting Fluorescence Signals of Samples in Microfluidic Devices Reactors

Genetic analysis in microfluidic devices commonly relies on detection of fluorescence intensity from dyes bound to DNA fragments. Aim of this work was to develop an experimental setup and a method for obtaining fluorescence intensity of liquids placed in microfluidic chips by analyzing digital fluorescence images under light excitation. This article describes an experimental setup for detection of fluorescence signal from sample placed into reaction chamber of microfluidic chips with a 25 × 40 mm field of view. The system directs excitation radiation from an LED (λavg = 480 nm, P = 3 W, Umax = 6 V, Imax = 0.6 A) through a bandpass filter (467–498 nm) and a lens onto the surface of a microfluidic chip. The selected parameters of the system enable efficient excitation of fluorescent dyes without overlapping their emission spectrum. Experiments were performed using fluorescein isothiocyanate solutions of different concentrations. Comparison of the signal-to-noise ratio values of the presented experimental setup with that of a commercially available realtime polymerase chain reaction device (ANK-48) has been carried out. The key advantages of the proposed system are its ability to perform full-area fluorescence detection on the microfluidic chip and its flexibility in terms of chip topology, i. e., the ability to work using chips of various designs and geometries.

1. Liu X, Sun A, Brodský J. [et al.] Microfluidics chips fabrication techniques comparison. Scientific Reports. 2024;14:28793. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80332-2

2. Gurkan UA, Wood DK, Carranza D, Herbertson LH, Diamond SL, Du E, Guha S, Di Paola J, Hines PC, Papautsky I, Shevkoplyas SS. Next generation microfluidics: fulfilling the promise of lab-on-a-chip technologies. Lab on a Chip. 2024;24(7):1867-1874.

3. Battat S, Weitz DA, Whitesides GM. An outlook on microfluidics: the promise and the challenge. Lab on a Chip. 2022;22(3):530-536. DOI: 10.1039/D1LC00731A

4. Chen S, Sun Y, Fan F, Chen S, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Meng X, Lin JM. Present status of microfluidic PCR chip in nucleic acid detection and future perspective. Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2022;157:116737. DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116737

5. Shahrajabian MH, Sun W. The significance and importance of dPCR, qPCR, and SYBR Green PCR kit in the detection of numerous diseases. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2024;30(3):169-179. DOI: 10.2174/0113816128276560231218090436

6. İnce GT, Yüksekkaya M, Haberal OE. Micropolymerase chain reaction for point-of-care detection and beyond: a review microfluidics and nanofluidics. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics. 2023;27(10):68. DOI: 10.1007/s10404-023-02677-w

7. Yun SH, Park JS, Koo SB, Park CY, Kim YS, Kim JD. Cost-effective multiplex fluorescence detection system for PCR chip. Sensors. 2021;21(21):6945. DOI: 10.3390/s21216945

8. Thompson DL, Pearson F, Thomas C, Rao R, Matthews D, Albala JS, Wachsmann-Hogiu S, Coleman MA. An Adaptable, Portable Microarray Reader for Biodetection. Sensors. 2009;9(4):2524-2537. DOI: 10.3390/s90402524

9. Esikova NA, Germash NN, Evstrapov AA. Rapid fabrication of microchips for PCR analysis from polymer materials in the laboratory conditions. "Nauchnoe Priborostroenie". 2020;30(4):21-26. DOI: 10.18358/np-30-4-i2126