Relationship between the Electrical Stimulation Frequency Optimal Value and the Magnitude of the Maximum Phase Shift, and the Force Developed by the Muscle
https://doi.org/10.21122/2220-9506-2025-16-2-168-174
Abstract
Electrical stimulation restorative treatment’s process of neuromuscular system’s diseases very important. Choice of the signal frequency-time parameters and its coordination with the biological tissues electrical parameters one of the main factors in the practice of electrical stimulation. The purpose of this article was to optimize the electrical action parameters in accordance with the muscles’s functional state. The studies were conducted on the biceps brachii of the upper limb of the subject and included: study of dependence of the effort developed by the muscle on the amplitude of the stimulating signal’s voltage and study of the interelectrode impedance phase-frequency characteristic of the upper limb biceps brachii of the subjects. As a result, relationship between the optimal value of the electrical stimulation frequency causing the maximum effort of the muscle and the magnitude of the phase shift of the phase-frequency characteristic of the tissues was determined. Dependence of the effort developed by the muscle during electrical stimulation on the amplitude of the stimulating signal magnitude at different values of electrical stimulation frequency was studied. It was established that with an increase of the stimulating signal amplitude, frequency of the phase-frequency characteristic’s extremum of the biotissue increases and accordingly the frequency of electrical stimulation that causes maximum muscle effort increases. Results of the work can be used in the design of electrical stimulation systems for musculoskeletal system with feedback.
About the Authors
А. N. OsipovBelarus
P. Brovki str., 6, Minsk 220013
I. O. Khazanovsky
Belarus
Address for correspondence:
Khazanovsky I.O.
Gornelektronics LLC,
Kozlova str. 50 B, Minsk 220088, Belarus,
e-mail: khaz_igor@yahoo.com
A. V. Paceev
Belarus
Makayonka str., 17, Minsk 220114
S. V. Paceev
Belarus
Ignatenko str., 8, Minsk 220035
References
1. Guryanova UA, Kovalchuk VV, Tikhoplav OA, Litvak FG. Functional electrical stimulation in gait recovery after stroke. Literature review. Physical and rehabilitation medicine, medical rehabilitation. 2020;2(3):244-262. DOI: 10/36425/rehab34831
2. Moineau B, Marquez-Chin C, Alizadeh-Meghrazi M. [et al.] Garments for functional electrical stimulation: design and proofs of concept. J. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. Eng. 2019,6:205566831985434. doi: 10.1177/2055668319854340
3. Vovk MI. Biotechnical systems for controlling human motor functions. Cybernetics and computing engineering. Kyiv. 2017;1(187):49-66.
4. Osipov AN, Khazanovsky IO, Kotov DA, Baltrukovich PI. Synthesis of electrical stimulation signals based on time-frequency analysis of electromyograms. Problems of Physics, Mathematics and Technology. Gomel. 2022;1(50):33-36.
5. Goldyrev EO, Akhmadeeva LR, Kharisova EM. Functional electrical stimulation in combination with pharmacotherapy in neurorehabilitation of cerebral ischemia and pain syndromes. Effective pharmacotherapy. 2024;20(34):44-49. doi: 10.33978/2307-3586-2024-20-34-44-49
6. Jovanovic LI, Kapadia N, Zivanovic V. [et al.] Brain–computer interface-triggered functional electrical stimulation therapy for rehabilitation of reaching and grasping after spinal cord injury: a feasibility study. Spinal Cord Series and Cases. 2021;7(24). doi: 10.1038/s41394-020-00380-4
7. Osuagwu BCA, Wallace L, Fraser M. [et al.] Rehabilitation of hand in subacute tetraplegic patients based on brain computer interface and functional electrical stimulation: a randomized pilot study. Journal of Neural Engineering. 2016;13(6):065002. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/6/065002
8. Arpin DJ, Ugiliweneza B, Forrest G, Harkema SJ and Rejc E. Optimizing Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Pulse Width and Amplitude to Promote Central Activation in Individuals With Severe Spinal Cord Injury. Front. Physiol. 2019;10:1310. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01310
9. Glushchuk SF, Pekker YaS. Adaptive electrical stimulators of the gastrointestinal tract. Bulletin of Tomsk Polytechnic University. 308(4):164-166.
10. Arpin DJ, Forrest G, Harkema SJ, and Rejc E. Submaximal marker for investigating peak muscle torque using neuromuscular electrical stimulation after paralysis. J. Neurotrauma. 2018;36,930-936. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.5848
11. Malygin AV. Determination of optimal parameters of transcranial electrical stimulation based on a mathematical model of neural structures, Medical Computer Technologies, 2009;5:25-32.
12. Electronic equipment for stimulation of organs and tissues / Edited by R.I. Utyamyshev and M. Vrana. Moscow: Energoatomizdat. 2000, p. 384.
Review
For citations:
Osipov N., Khazanovsky I.O., Paceev A.V., Paceev S.V. Relationship between the Electrical Stimulation Frequency Optimal Value and the Magnitude of the Maximum Phase Shift, and the Force Developed by the Muscle. Devices and Methods of Measurements. 2025;16(2):168-174. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21122/2220-9506-2025-16-2-168-174