Development of Engineering Models of Nanosatellites for Student Training
https://doi.org/10.21122/2220-9506-2022-13-3-172-179
Abstract
The work purpose is the development of BSUIM-1 and BSUIM-2 complexes for training specialists in the aerospace industry with the used engineering test beds and experimental facilities.
Two sets of nanosatellite engineering models and ground stations had developed. They allow testing hardware and software of the onboard equipment and payload, simulating operation modes, and flight programs, and enable students to gain practical skills in working with ultra-small satellites. The complexes include ground stations, 2 ultra-small satellite simulators, BSUSAT-1 low-orbit nanosatellite, remote access laboratory, local and external servers for data storage. The complexes' website and database allow for full-time and remote training. The experience gained in conducting experiments, processing telemetry, and structuring information in the database is used for further development. All the developed equipment is made based on commercial off-the-shelf elements. It has reduced development costs, flexible equipment reconfiguration, and easier access to the simulator's internal architecture for demonstration purposes.
The developed complexes allow students to practically study the ultra-small satellite components design and ground stations, methods for receiving and processing telemetry and scientific information, attitude determination and control algorithms. The complexes allow to conduct of research in the development of individual onboard systems and special-purpose equipment of the nanosatellite and their testing in the loop. The results obtained are introduced into the educational process and are used in lectures and laboratory classes for aerospace specialties students. The developed complexes make it possible to carry out term papers, theses, and master’s works related to the design of hardware and software for nanosatellites and a ground station, the setting up of space experiments, the development of new algorithms and a flight program for ultra-small satellites.
About the Authors
V. Е. EvchikBelarus
Address for correspondence:
Evchik V.Е. -
Belarusian State University,
Nezavisimosti Ave., 4, Minsk 220030, Belarus e-mail: slava97evev@gmail.com
A. A. Spiridonov
Belarus
Nezavisimosti Ave., 4, Minsk 220030
D. V. Ushakov
Belarus
Nezavisimosti Ave., 4, Minsk 220030
V. S. Baranova
Belarus
Nezavisimosti Ave., 4, Minsk 220030
I. A. Shalatonin
Belarus
Nezavisimosti Ave., 4, Minsk 220030
V. A. Saechnikov
Belarus
Nezavisimosti Ave., 4, Minsk 220030
References
1. Khanov V.Kh., Shakhmatov A.V., Chekmarev S.A., Lepeshkina E.S. CubeSat onboard control system on the base of “system-on-chip” technology. Journal of Instrument Engineering, 2018, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 403– 408. DOI: 10.17586/0021-3454-2018-61-5-403-408
2. Davoli F., Kourogiorgas C., Marchese M., Patrone F. Small satellites and CubeSats: Survey of structures, architectures, and protocols. International Journal of Satellite Communications and Networking, 2019, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 343–359. DOI: 10.1002/sat.1277
3. Chin Jamie, Coelho Roland, Foley Justin, Johnstone Alicia. Basic Concepts and Processes for First-Time CubeSat Developers. CubeSat101, CaliforDesign of a CubeSat Testbednia, 2017, 96 p.
4. Shiroma W.A., Martin L.K., Akagi J.M., Akagi J.T. CubeSats: A bright future for nanosatellites. Central European Journal of Engineering, 2011, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 9–15.
5. Tavakoli A., Faghihinia A., Kalhor A. An Innovative test bed for verification of attitude control system. IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag., 2017, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 16–22. DOI: 10.1109/MAES.2017.150198
6. Hurtado J., Goecks V.G., Probe A. Low-Cost Satellite Attitude Hardware Test Bed. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, USA, 26–29 June 2016.
7. Edries M.Y., Tanaka A., Cho M. Design and Testing of Electrical Power Subsystem of a Lean Satellite, HORYU-IV. Trans. Jpn. Soc. Aeronaut. Space Sci. Aerosp. Technol. Jpn, 2016, vol. 14, no. 30, pp. 7–16.
8. Volodin K.I., Krohin I.A., Pahomov S.A. Cubesat-R – yet another modular educational kit for everybody. Modern Information Technologies, 2015, vol. 21, pp. 182–184.
9. Tanaka T., Kawamura Y., Tanaka T. Overview and operations of CubeSat FITSAT-1 (NIWAKA). 6th International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies (RAST), 2013, pp. 887–892. DOI: 10.1109/RAST.2013.6581339
10. Kalman A.E.. Overview of the CubeSat Kit. Pumpkin Inc., 2004, 30 p.
11. Barnhart D.J., Sellers J.J. EyasSat-cubed: a Lowcost On-ramp for Nanosatellite Programs. AIAA SPACE 2013 Conference and Exposition, San Diego, 2013. DOI: 10.2514/6.2013-5325
12. Groenewald C.J. Attitude Determination and Control System for EyasSAT for Hardware In the Loop Application. Stellenbosch University Department of Electric and Electronic Engineering, 2014, 180 p.
13. Shalatonin I.A., Spiridonov A.A., Saechnikov V.A., Volkov A.V., Dоmbrovski V.V., Sacuta D.V., Koltun B.V., Stankevich D.S., Оrlov O.A., Graevski V.V. Hardwares and softwares testing for nanosatellites laboratory development. Complex problems of technosphere safety, State educational establishment of higher professional education Voronezh state technical University, 2016, pp. 70–73.
14. Hryny D.N., Dombrowski V.V., Koltun B.V., Saechnikov V.A. , Spiridonov A.A. , Shalatonin I.A. Software of information complex for testing onboard systems and scientific equipment of nanosatellites. Fundamental problems of system security, Sevastopol, September 13– 15, 2017, pp. 74–79.
15. Spiridonov A.A., Saechnikov V.A., Ushakov D.V., Kezik A.G., Cherny V.E., Verstakovskaya A.P., Evchik V.E. Research and educational network of ground stations for receiving and processing information from educational satellites. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/966/1/012104
16. Evchik V.E., Samonov P.V., Saechnikov V.A., Spiridonov A.A., Ushakov D.V. Attitude determination and control system for nanosatellite simulator. Materials of the II International scientific-practical conference “Computer technologies and data analysis” (CTDA’2020), April 23–24, 2020, Minsk, pp. 233–237.
17. Zielinski B.M. Effective throughput of AX.25 protocol. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Technical Sciences, 2013, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 639–647. DOI: 10.2478/bpasts-2013-0068
18. Paci D., Cantoni A., Allegato G. Magnetometers. Silicon Sensors and Actuators, 2022, pp. 477–501. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-80135-9_14
19. Hajiyev C., Soken H. In-Orbit Calibration of Small Satellite Magnetometers. Fault Tolerant Attitude Estimation for Small Satellites, 2020, pp. 277–316. DOI: 10.1201/9781351248839-17
20. Yakupoglu S., Esit M., Soken H., Hajiyev C. Backup Magnetometer-Only Attitude Estimation Algorithm for Small Satellites. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2020, vol. 22, iss. 13, pp. 13544–13551. DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3175261
21. Borik S., Babusiak B., Cap I. Device for Accelerometer and Gyroscope Measurements. Information Technologies in Biomedicine, 2014, vol. 4, pp. 139–146. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-06596-0_13
22. LaMeres B.J. The MSP430. Embedded Systems Design using the MSP430FR2355 LaunchPad™. Springer, Cham, 2020, pp. 143–161. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-40574-8_4
23. Ahmad Y.A., Nazim J., Yuhaniz S. Design of a terminal node controller hardware for CubeSat tracking applications. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2016, vol. 152, no. 1, p. 012031. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/152/1/012031
24. Verstakovskaya A.P., Evchik V.E., Kezik A.G., Saechnikov V.A., Solovyov S.A., Spiridonov A.A., Ushakov D.V., Cherny V.E. Ground station for receiving telemetry and determining the orbit of an ultra-small satellites. Materials of the II International scientific-practical conference “Computer technologies and data analysis” (CTDA’2020), April 23–24, 2020, Minsk, pp. 224–228.
25. Mohammed M.A. OSI model. Guide to OSI and TCP/IP Models, 2014, pp. 5–17. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-05152-9_2
26. Martínez Ú., Bravo L., Gligor D., Olfe K. Attitude control research with educational nanosatellites. A: “4th Symposium on Space Educational Activities”. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 2022. DOI: 10.5821/conference-9788419184405.032
27. Colombo C., Scala F., Trisolini M. CubeSat Mission Concept for Environmental Analysis in Low Earth Orbit. 72nd International Astronautical Congress (IAC 2021), Dubai, 2021, 15 p.
28. Modenini D., Bahu A., Tortora P. Nanosatelliteclass dynamic attitude simulator for hands-on aerospace control education. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2021, vol. 54, iss. 12, pp. 38–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.11.007
29. Monowar M.I., Cho M.. Over-the-Air Firmware Update for an Educational CubeSat Project. International Review of Aerospace Engineering (IREASE), 2021, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 39. DOI: 10.15866/irease.v14i1.19832
30. Maheshwarappa M.R., Bridges C.P. Software defined radios for small satellites. NASA/ESA Conference on Adaptive Hardware and Systems (AHS), UK, 2014, pp. 172–179. DOI: 10.1109/AHS.2014.6880174
Review
For citations:
Evchik V.Е., Spiridonov A.A., Ushakov D.V., Baranova V.S., Shalatonin I.A., Saechnikov V.A. Development of Engineering Models of Nanosatellites for Student Training. Devices and Methods of Measurements. 2022;13(3):172-179. https://doi.org/10.21122/2220-9506-2022-13-3-172-179