Determination of the Error in Transferring of Length Unit’s Size when Measuring the Nanoparticles’ Diameter Using an Analyzer of Particles’ Differential Electrical Mobility

The quality of nanomaterials and nanotechnologies is largely determined by the stability of the applied technologies, which, to a large extent, depend on the constancy of particle sizes. In this regard, metrological problems arise that are associated both with measuring the dimensions of the microstructure of aerosols, suspensions and powders, and with ensuring the uniformity of measurements when transferring a unit of a physical quantity from a standard to working measuring instruments. The purpose of this work was to determine and calculate the error in transferring the size of a unit of length when measuring the diameter of nanoparticles.

An analyzer of differential electric mobility of particles was determined as a reference measuring instrument for which the calculation was made. It allows the separation of aerosol particles based on the dependence of their electrical mobility on the particle size. In combination with a condensation particle counter, it allows you to scan an aerosol and build a particle size distribution function. This measurement method is the most accurate in the field of measuring the diameters of particles in aerosols, therefore, the error in the transmission of particle size must be set as for a standard.

The paper describes the physical principles of measurement by this method and presents an equation for determining the diameter of nanoparticles. Based on this equation, the sources of non-excluded systematic error were identified. Also, an experimental method was used to determine the random component of the measurement error of nanoparticles and to calculate the error in transferring the size of a unit of length when measuring the diameter of nanoparticles.

The obtained results will be used for metrological support of standard samples of particle size, ensuring traceability of measurements of aerosol particle counters and for aerosol research.

1. Lux Research. Sizing Nanotechnology's Value Chain, 2004.

2. Gleiter H. Nanostructured materials: basicconsepts and microstructure. Actamater, 2000, vol. 48, pp. 1–29. DOI: 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00285-2

3. Alymov M.I. Mechanical properties of nanocrystalline materials. Moscow: MIFI Publ., 2004, 32 p. DOI: 10.17277/amt.2017.02pp.010-018

4. Glezer A.M. Amorphous and nanocrystalline structures: similarities, differences, mutual transitions. Russian Chemical Journal, 2002, vol. XVLI, no. 5, pp. 57–63. DOI: 10.1134/S1087659612010038

5. Poole Ch., Owens F. Nanotechnology. Publishing house 5th. Moscow: Tekhnosfera Publ., 2010, 336 p.

6. NNI (National Nanotechnology Initiative) 2011, Environmental, Health, and Safety Strategy.

7. Tigges L., Wiedensohler A., Weinhold K., Gandhi J., Schmid H.-J. Bipolar charge distribution of a soft X-ray diffusion charger. J. Aerosol Sci., 2015, vol. 90, pp. 77–86. DOI: 10.1016/J.JAEROSCI.2015.07.002

8. Kim J.H., Mulholland G.W., Kukuck S.R., Pui D.Y.H. Slip Correction Measurements of Certified PSL Nanoparticles Using a Nanometer Differential Mobility Analyzer (Nano-DMA) for Knudsen Number From 0.5 to 83. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol., 2005, vol. 110, pp. 31–54. DOI: 10.6028/jres.110.005

9. ISO 15900:2020 Determination of particle size distribution – Differential electrical mobility analysis for aerosol particles.