Determination of Flow Characteristics in Technological Processes with Controlled Pressure
https://doi.org/10.21122/2220-9506-2020-11-3-204-211
Abstract
Assessment of the environmental and economic performance of a safety valve requires information about the flow of the substance through the valve when it is actuated. The goal of this paper was to determine the flow rate of the discharged substance and the mass flow rate of the substance entering the safety valve when it is actuated.
Proposed a mathematical model to describe the processes occurring in the valve. The model includes a system of differential equations describing the physical laws of conservation in the internal volume of the valve and differential equations, which link the value of gas flow through the valve with the pressure and the amount of movement of the shut-off disk. Used a modified method by S.K. Godunov to solve gasdynamic equations.
Established that the determination of the flow and power characteristics of the valve requires the preliminary construction of a mathematical model of the safety valve operation. Based on this, proposed a method for determining the flow rate of the discharged substance and the mass rate of the substance entering the safety valve when it is actuated.
Obtained the flow characteristics of the valves under review and the dynamics of movement of the shutoff disc of the valve, as well as the dependence of the pressure change on the opening time of the valve. Comparison of the calculated values with available experimental data gives good agreement of results (no more than 5.6 % for a gas flow rate, under 10 % for the movement of the valve and change the arrival of gas in time using the standard deviation function of the flow characteristics of 0.6 %), confirms the correctness of the defined mathematical model, used numerical schemes and algorithms, as well as the proposed method and recoverability of the arrival of gas in a pressure–time curve.
About the Authors
T. ReaderRussian Federation
Studencheskaya str., 7, Izhevsk 426069
V. A. Tenenev
Russian Federation
Studencheskaya str., 7, Izhevsk 426069
A. A. Chernova
Russian Federation
Address for correspondence: А.А. Chernova – Kalashnikov Izhevsk State Technical University, Studencheskaya str., 7, Izhevsk 426069, Russia
e-mail: alicaaa@gmail.com
References
1. Faizov A.R., Churakova S.K., Pruchay V.S. Simulation mode of emission from the distillation column. Bashkir chemistry journal, 2013, no. 2, pp. 52−54.
2. Beune A., Kuerten J.G.M., Schmidt J. Numerical calculation and experimental validation of safety valve flows at pressures up to 600 bar. AIChE Journal, 2011, vol. 57, pp. 3285−3298.
3. Bernad S.I., Susan-Resiga R. Numerical model for cavitational flow in hydraulic poppet valves. Modelling and Simulation in Engineering, 2012, vol. 2012, pp. 1−10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/742162
4. Tusyuk S.K., Belyanskaya E.S. Diagnostic internet − testing first − year students in the tula state university. Izvestiya TulGU [News of the Tula state university. Technical sciences], 2012, no. 12−2, pp. 262−267 (in Russian).
5. Boronenko M.P. Overview of application of high-velocity television measuring systems in a physical experiment. Yugra state university, 2014, no. 2(33), pp. 43−55.
6. Fyodorov S.A. Embedded software of high speed IP camera for optical diagnostic of the fleeting processes. Proceedings of TUSUR, no. 1, 2 part [25], pp. 225–229.
7. Song X., Cui L., Cao M., Cao W., Park Yo., Dempster W.M. A CFD analysis of the dynamics of a directoperated safety relief valve mounted on a pressure vessel. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, vol. 81, pp. 407–419. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.02.021
8. Reader T., Tenenev V.A., Paklina N.V. Numerical 3D Simulation of Safety Valve Gas Dynamics. Vestnik Izhevsk state technical University named after M.T. Kalashnikov [Bulletin of Kalashnikov ISTU], 2018, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 174−181 (in Russian). DOI: 10.22213/2410-9304-2018-2-28-40
9. Volkov K.N., Emelyanov V.N. Large-eddy simulation in the calculation of turbulent flows. Moscow. 2008, 368 p.
10. Godunov S.K., Kulikov I.M. Computation of discontinuous solutions of fluid dynamics equations with entropy nondecrease guarantee. Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 2013, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 1179−1182. DOI: 10.1134/S0965542514060086
11. Smirnova N.S. Comparison of flux splitting schemes for numerical solution of the compressible Euler equations. Proceedings of MIPT, 2018, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 122−141.
12. Wesseling Pieter Dr. Principles of computational fluid dynamics. Springer series in computational mathematics, ISSN 0179-3632; 29. Mathematics Subject Classification, 1991: 76M,65M, XII, 644 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-05146-3
13. Tenenev V.A., Gorokhov M.M., Rusyak I.G. Numerical study of particle Gorenje in a two-phase flow. Mathematical modeling, 1997, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 87−96.
14. Wesseling P., Segal A., Kassel C.G.M. Computing Flows on General Three-Dimensional Nonsmooth Staggered Grids. Journal of Computational Physics, 1999, vol. 149, pp. 333–362. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-1564-5_2
Review
For citations:
Reader T., Tenenev V.A., Chernova A.A. Determination of Flow Characteristics in Technological Processes with Controlled Pressure. Devices and Methods of Measurements. 2020;11(3):204-211. https://doi.org/10.21122/2220-9506-2020-11-3-204-211