Preview

SPECTRAL FILTRATION OF IMAGES BY MEANS OF DISPERSIVE SYSTEMS

https://doi.org/10.21122/2220-9506-2016-7-3-92-102

Abstract

Instruments for spectral filtration of images are an important element of the systems used in remote sensing, medical diagnostics, in-process measurements. The aim of this study is analysis of the functional features and characteristics of the proposed two image monochromator versions which are based on dispersive spectral filtering. The first is based on the use of a dispersive monochromator, where collimating and camera lenses form a telescopic system, the dispersive element of which is within the intermediate image plane. The second version is based on an imaging double monochromator with dispersion subtraction by back propagation. For the telescopic system version, the spectral and spatial resolutions are estimated, the latter being limited by aberrations and diffraction from the entrance slit. The device has been numerically simulated and prototyped. It is shown that for the spectral bandwidth 10 nm (visible spectral range), the aberration-limited spot size is from 10–20 μm at the image center to about 30 μm at the image periphery for the image size 23–27 mm. The monochromator with dispersion subtraction enables one to vary the spectral resolution (up to 1 nm and higher) by changing the intermediate slit width. But the distinctive feature is a significant change in the selected central wavelength over the image field. The considered designs of dispersive image monochromators look very promising due to the particular advantages over the systems based on tunable filters as regards the spectral resolution, fast tuning, and the spectral contrast. The monochromator based on a telescopic system has a simple design and a rather large image field but it also has a limited light throughput due to small aperture size. The monochromator with dispersion subtraction has higher light throughput, can provide high spectral resolution when recording a full data cube in a series of measuring acts for different dispersive element positions. 

About the Authors

I. M. Gulis
Belarusian State University
Belarus

Address for correspondence: Gulis I.M. – Belarusian State University, Nezavisimosty Ave., 4, 220030, Minsk, Belarus  e-mail: gulis@bsu.by



A. G. Kupreyeu
Belarusian State University
Belarus


References

1. Xie Y., Sha Z., Yu M. Remote sensing imagery in vegetation mapping: a review. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2008, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 9–23. doi: org/10.1093/jpe/rtm005

2. Govender M., Chetty K., Bulcock H. A review of hyperspectral remote sensing and its application in vegetation and water resource studies. Water SA, 2007, vol. 33, pp. 145–151. doi: org/10.4314/wsa.v33i2.49049

3. Qin J., Chao K., Kim M.S., Lu R., Burks T.F. Hyperspectral and multispectral imaging for evaluating food safety and quality. Journal of Food Engineering, 2013, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 157–171. doi: org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.04.001

4. Herold M., Roberts D.A. Multispectral Satellites – Imaging Spectrometry – LIDAR: Spatial-Spectral Tradeoffs in Urban Mapping. International Journal of Geoinformatics, 2006, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–13.

5. Thompson D.R., Leifer I., Bovensmann H., Eastwood M., Fladeland M., Frankenberg C., Gerilowski K., Green R.O., Kratwurst S., Krings T., Luna B., Thorpe A.K. Real-time remote detection and measurement for airborne imaging spectroscopy: a case study with methane. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2015, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 4383–4397. doi: org/10.5194/amt-8-4383-2015

6. Kuula J., Pölönen I., Puupponen H.H., Selander T., Reinikainen T., Kalenius T., Saari H. Using VIS/NIR and IR spectral cameras for detecting and separating crime scene details. Proceedings SPIE, 2012, vol. 8359, pp. 83590P-1–83590P-11. doi: org/10.1117/12.918555

7. Lu G., Fei B. Medical hyperspectral imaging: a review. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2014, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 010901-1–010901-23. doi: org/10.1117/1.JBO.19.1.010901

8. Grégori G., Patsekin V., Rajwa B., Jones J., Ragheb K., Holdman C., Robinson J.P. Hyperspectral cytometry at the single-cell level using a 32-channel photodetector. Cytometry Part A, 2012, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 35–44. doi: org/10.1002/cyto.a.21120

9. Pierce M.C., Schwarz R.A., Bhattar V.S., Mondrik S., Williams M.D., Lee J.J., Richards-Kortum R., Gillenwater A.M. Accuracy of in vivo multimodal optical imaging for detection of oral neoplasia. Cancer Prevention Research, 2012, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 801–809. doi: org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0555

10. Chin J.A., Wang E.C., Kibbe M.R. Evaluation of hyperspectral technology for assessing the presence and severity of peripheral artery disease. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2011, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1679–1688. doi: org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.06.022

11. Micijevic E., Vanderwerff K., Scaramuzza P., Morfitt R.A., Barsi J.A., Levy R. On-orbit performance of the Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager. Proceedings SPIE, 2014, vol. 9218, pp. 921816-1–921816-12. doi: org/10.1117/12.2063338

12. Liang H. Advances in multispectral and hyperspectral imaging for archaeology and art conservation. Applied Physics A, 2012, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 309–323. doi: org/10.1007/s00339-011-6689-1

13. Hagen N., Kudenov M.W. Review of snapshot spectral imaging technologies. Optical Engineering, 2013, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 090901-1–090901-23. doi: org/10.1117/1.OE.52.9.090901

14. Vila-Francés J., Calpe-Maravilla J., GómezChova L., Amorós-López J. Improving the performance of acousto-optic tunable filters in imaging applications. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 2014, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 043022-1–043022-9. doi: org/10.1117/1.3518139

15. Ding L., Cooper J.W., Kowalewski M.G., Smith G.R., Butler J.J. Characterization of a double monochromator. Proceedings SPIE, 2010, vol. 7826, pp. 782624-1–782624-10. doi: org/10.1117/12.865091

16. Gulis I.M., Kupreyeu A.G., Kostukevich A.G. [Double image monochromator with dispersion subtraction]. Vestnik BGU. Series 1, 2011, no. 2, pp. 19–23 (in Russian).

17. Gulis I.M., Kupreyeu A.G. [Spectral selection in image monochromator with dispersion subtraction]. Vestnik BGU. Series 1, 2014, no. 3, pp. 3–7 (in Russian).

18. Gulis I.M., Kupreyeu A.G. Low-Aberration Imaging Monochromator with Dispersion Subtraction Based on an Axially Symmetric Design. Journal of Applied Spectroscopy, 2015, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 131–136. doi: org/10.1007/s10812-015-0075-2

19. Behr B.B., Meade J.T., Hajian A.R., Cenko A.T. High-performance hyperspectral imaging using virtual slit optics. Proceedings SPIE, 2013, vol. 8726, pp. 872604- 1–872604-11. doi: org/10.1117/12.2016011


Review

For citations:


Gulis I.M., Kupreyeu A.G. SPECTRAL FILTRATION OF IMAGES BY MEANS OF DISPERSIVE SYSTEMS. Devices and Methods of Measurements. 2016;7(3):262-270. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21122/2220-9506-2016-7-3-92-102

Views: 999


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2220-9506 (Print)
ISSN 2414-0473 (Online)